It is good to have principles,
but to insist on one’s principles,
at all times, is akin to fundamentalism
and should be avoided.
To have principles and act upon them is often seen as a positive attitude. We say often about others, “He is a man of principle and he will not violate his principles.”
For sure, this applies especially of good behaviour and is recognised as a good rule of personal conduct to have.
We complain often enough about the conduct of politicians and journalists and accusing them of not having any principles. Oh, they have their principles, but not the ones we expect them to have.
It is possible, that some people have the principle not to have any, bar the one, not to have any.
So, we are actually talking about “good” principles. We live on this earth and try our best to live in harmony with our fellow human beings. Principles will help but what if “our” principles clash with the principles of the others?
If we insist on our principles and the others insist on theirs, there could be trouble in the form of a bad argument or even conflict. Perhaps there should be another principle that encourages us to talk things over. There must be some overarching principles, like human rights.
Insisting on principles could be a form of fundamentalism. Perhaps the guiding principle should be the principle of approximation.
“Approximation” is a term well-known in science and mathematics but could also be applied to human behaviour.
“Face-saving” and compromising could fall under the principle of approximation.
Perhaps, next time you have an argument based on one of your principles you might consider, that you are seen as a fundamentalist or just plain bloody-minded.